Why I Ditched Zettelkasten for a "Fluid" Note-Taking System

by admin in Productivity & Tools 19 - Last Update December 2, 2025

Rate: 4/5 points in 19 reviews
Why I Ditched Zettelkasten for a

I need to confess something. For almost a year, I was a die-hard Zettelkasten evangelist. I read the books, watched the videos, and meticulously crafted my network of atomic, linked notes. It was supposed to be a \'second brain,\' a partner in my thinking process. But honestly? It started to feel more like a second job. The pressure to atomize every thought and find the perfect link was creating more friction than flow.

I realized I was spending more time on the *method* than on the *thinking*. My digital garden wasn\'t a place of creative growth; it was a perfectly manicured, rigid structure I was afraid to mess up. That\'s when I knew something had to change. I decided to break the rules and build a system that worked for my brain, not the other way around.

The hidden friction of a rigid system

The core promise of Zettelkasten is that by breaking down ideas into their smallest components and linking them, you\'ll uncover novel connections. And in theory, that\'s beautiful. But in practice, I found myself wrestling with constant questions that stalled my momentum. Is this note \'atomic\' enough? What\'s the right ID for this? Which three existing notes should this link to? It was exhausting.

My creativity felt stifled. Instead of capturing a fleeting idea in its raw, messy form, I\'d pause, trying to fit it into the predefined structure. The system that was supposed to serve my thinking was now dictating how I was allowed to think. The cognitive overhead was just too high, and the joy of discovery was being replaced by the anxiety of maintenance.

Discovering the \'fluid\' approach to knowledge

My \'aha\' moment came when I gave myself permission to be messy. I decided to build what I now call a \"Fluid System.\" It’s not about having no structure; it’s about letting the structure emerge organically over time, based on my actual thoughts and projects, rather than imposing it from the start.

This approach embraces the natural, non-linear way our brains work. It prioritizes capturing ideas quickly and easily, worrying about connections and organization later. It’s a shift from being an \'archivist\' of perfect notes to being a \'gardener\' who plants seeds of thought and tends to them as they grow and connect naturally.

The core principles of my fluid system

After months of experimenting, I\'ve settled on a few core principles that guide my process. They\'re simple, flexible, and designed to minimize friction and maximize thinking.

  • Capture First, Organize Later: I have a single \'inbox\' where every fleeting thought, quote, or idea goes. There\'s no pressure to format it, tag it, or link it immediately. The goal is to get it out of my head and into the system with zero resistance.
  • Structure is Project-Driven: Instead of a universal web of links, I create structure around active projects or specific areas of interest. A folder for a new article, a tag for a developing hobby. This makes my knowledge immediately actionable.
  • Linking is for Insight, Not Obligation: I only create a link between notes when a genuine, \'aha!\' connection sparks in my mind. I\'m not forcing relationships between notes just for the sake of it. This makes each link meaningful and valuable.
  • Embrace Impermanence: Notes aren\'t sacred texts. They can be merged, rewritten, expanded, or even deleted. My system is a living workshop, not a pristine museum. This freedom to change and adapt is, for me, the key to real creativity.

By letting go of the rigid dogma, I\'ve found a new level of clarity and productivity. My notes are messier, but my thinking is clearer. I\'m building knowledge that serves me, not a system I have to serve. And honestly, it has made all the difference.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the main drawback of the Zettelkasten method for some users?
For some, the primary drawback is the high cognitive overhead. The strict rules about creating 'atomic' notes, linking them, and managing a complex web can lead to spending more time on system maintenance than on actual thinking, which can stifle creativity.
What does a 'fluid' note-taking system mean?
A 'fluid' system is a more flexible approach to Personal Knowledge Management. It prioritizes the easy capture of ideas first and allows structure (like folders, tags, or links) to emerge organically over time, usually in response to specific projects or interests, rather than imposing a rigid structure from the start.
How do you start building a fluid note-taking system?
The easiest way to start is by creating a single, frictionless 'inbox' for all your ideas. Use a simple notes app and just focus on capturing thoughts as they come, without worrying about organizing them. Let go of the pressure to be perfect and just write.
Is a fluid system better than Zettelkasten for everyone?
Not at all. The best system is highly personal. Zettelkasten is incredibly powerful for those whose minds work well with its structured, bottom-up approach, such as academic researchers. A fluid system is an alternative for those who find that rigidity creates too much friction.
Can you combine principles of Zettelkasten with a fluid system?
Absolutely. A great approach is a hybrid model. You could use a fluid 'inbox' for raw ideas and then selectively 'promote' well-developed thoughts into a more structured, Zettelkasten-like network of permanent notes. This gives you the best of both worlds: low-friction capture and high-quality organization.