Why I Ditched PARA for a Simpler System in Obsidian

by admin in Productivity & Tools 16 - Last Update November 19, 2025

Rate: 4/5 points in 16 reviews
Why I Ditched PARA for a Simpler System in Obsidian

I have to admit, I was completely sold on the PARA method at first. The idea of a universal system for organizing my entire digital life—Projects, Areas, Resources, and Archives—felt like the key to unlocking a true \'second brain.\' I dove into Obsidian, meticulously creating the four top-level folders, convinced that digital clarity was just around the corner. For a few months, it felt structured and purposeful. But then, the friction started.

I found myself spending more time deciding where a note should go than actually thinking about its content. Was this book summary a \'Resource,\' or was it part of a \'Project\' to write an article? Is my fitness journey an \'Area\' or a collection of \'Resources\'? This constant micro-decision-making was exhausting. My \'second brain\' was becoming a source of anxiety, a perfectly organized library that I was too intimidated to use. The system was managing me, not the other way around.

The moment I realized structure should emerge, not be enforced

The turning point for me was when I couldn\'t find a crucial insight I\'d jotted down weeks earlier. I knew I had the note, but I had no idea which of the four PARA buckets I\'d dropped it into. It was lost in my own rigid system. That’s when it hit me: the most powerful connections aren\'t hierarchical; they\'re contextual. I didn\'t need a better filing cabinet; I needed a web of ideas that mirrored how my own brain works.

So, I archived my entire PARA setup and started with a single, terrifyingly blank slate in Obsidian. My goal was to reduce friction to zero and let the structure build itself over time through links and tags.

My new fluid, \'bottom-up\' approach

Instead of rigid folders, my system now revolves around three simple concepts that prioritize thinking over organizing. It\'s less of a \'method\' and more of a philosophy.

  • The Daily Note is Everything: All new thoughts, ideas, meeting notes, and fleeting thoughts go into my daily note. There\'s no decision to be made. I just open one file and start typing. This is my inbox for the entire day.
  • Process Through Linking: At the end of the day, or a few times a week, I review my daily notes. I turn raw ideas into more permanent, atomic notes. The key here isn\'t filing them away; it\'s asking, \"What other notes does this relate to?\" I create links to existing concepts, people, or topics.
  • Tags for Status, Links for Context: I use a very limited set of tags, primarily for status (e.g., #todo, #in-progress, #seedling). All the rich, conceptual connection is done through backlinks. This way, when I look at a note, I see a web of related ideas, not a rigid folder path.

Honestly, it felt chaotic at first. But after a few weeks, Obsidian\'s graph view started to light up with organic clusters of thought. I was discovering connections I never would have made with PARA. I wasn\'t just storing information anymore; I was cultivating a garden of interconnected ideas. It\'s a system that serves my thinking, and for me, that\'s been the most profound productivity shift of all.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

What is the PARA method?
PARA is a productivity method for organizing digital information, created by Tiago Forte. It stands for Projects (short-term efforts), Areas (long-term responsibilities), Resources (topics of interest), and Archives (inactive items). The goal is to create an actionable and simple organizational system.
Is the PARA method bad for productivity?
Not at all. For many people, especially those who are very project-focused and prefer clear structure, PARA is an excellent system. From my experience, it becomes less effective when your work is more about creative thinking and connecting disparate ideas, as the rigid hierarchy can sometimes stifle organic discovery.
What makes Obsidian a good tool for alternative note-taking systems?
Obsidian's power comes from its emphasis on bidirectional linking (backlinks) and its graph view. This allows you to build a network of notes that connect contextually, rather than just storing them in folders. It's ideal for systems where you want structure to emerge naturally from your thoughts.
How can I start building a simpler system if PARA feels too complex?
I'd suggest starting with a 'daily note' as your primary inbox for all thoughts. Don't worry about organization at first. Focus on capturing ideas and then, as a separate step, create links between related concepts. Let your system's structure grow from those connections over time.
What's the biggest mistake people make when organizing digital notes?
In my experience, the biggest mistake is prioritizing organizing over thinking. We can get so caught up in creating the 'perfect' system of folders and tags that we forget the goal is to use our notes to think better and create things. A good system should reduce friction, not add to it.