Automating Dev Workflows with Scripts
by admin in Productivity & Tools 25 - Last Update December 3, 2025
For the longest time, I resisted scripting my daily tasks. It felt like a form of procrastination—why spend an hour writing a script to automate a task that only takes two minutes? It seemed like a classic case of a developer over-engineering a simple problem. I was wrong, and it took me an embarrassingly long time to realize just how much mental energy I was wasting on repetitive, mindless work.
Why I finally gave in to automation
The turning point wasn\'t a single big event. It was the slow, creeping realization that the \'two-minute task\' was never just two minutes. It was starting a new feature branch, which meant creating the branch, pulling the latest from main, creating a new test file, and updating a task tracker. It was deploying a small fix, which involved running tests, linting, building the container, pushing it, and then SSH\'ing into a server to pull the new image. Each step was small, but together they were a constant drain on my focus. I realized I was spending more time on the \'process\' of coding than on the actual coding itself.
My first scripts that changed everything
I didn\'t try to build a master script to rule them all. Honestly, that was my first failed attempt. I learned my lesson and started small, focusing on the most frequent and annoying tasks. These are the ones that gave me the quickest wins.
The \'new project\' setup
Every time I started a small project or a proof-of-concept, I\'d create the same folders: /src, /tests, /docs, /.github. Then I\'d initialize a Git repository, create a .gitignore file, and install a few base dependencies. I wrote a simple Bash script that does all of this with one command. It asks for a project name and then builds out my entire preferred starting structure. It\'s my personal boilerplate generator, and it saves me from a dozen tedious clicks and commands every single time.
The one-command build and deploy
This one was a game-changer. Our team\'s staging deployment process had about six manual steps. It was easy to forget one, especially on a Friday afternoon. I chained them all together in a script. Now, a single command does the following:
- Runs all unit and integration tests.
- Lints the entire codebase to check for style issues.
- Builds the production-ready application.
- Pushes the final build to our artifact repository.
- Sends a notification to our team\'s Slack channel.
It not only saves time but also enforces consistency and prevents \'oops, I forgot to run the tests\' errors. I sleep better knowing the process is repeatable and reliable.
The biggest mistake I made when starting
My initial impulse was to create a perfect, complex, all-in-one script. I spent a weekend trying to build a \'dev assistant\' that could handle everything. It became a monstrous, unmaintainable mess that I quickly abandoned. The real success came when I changed my mindset. My advice is this: don\'t try to automate your entire workflow. Find the single most annoying, repetitive task you do more than five times a day and automate just that. Once that script is solid and you\'re using it without thinking, find the next one. Small, incremental automation is sustainable and incredibly powerful.
Choosing the right tool for the job
I often get asked whether to use Bash, Python, or something else. My personal rule of thumb is simple. If the task is mostly about running other command-line tools and moving files around, I stick with Bash. It\'s simple, it\'s everywhere, and it\'s perfect for chaining commands. If the task requires any real logic, like parsing JSON from an API call, handling complex error conditions, or managing state, I immediately reach for Python. Its readability and powerful libraries make it a much better choice for anything more than a few lines. Honestly, the best tool is the one you know well enough to be productive with right now.
Ultimately, automating my workflow wasn\'t about saving a few minutes here and there. It was about preserving my creative energy for the complex problems that I\'m actually paid to solve. It\'s about reducing friction and staying in a state of flow for longer. And for that, the upfront investment has paid for itself a hundred times over.